Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic

211 A.2d 76, 205 Pa. Super. 551, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1117

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 17, 1965

DocketAppeal, No. 97

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 211 A.2d 76 (Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic, 211 A.2d 76, 205 Pa. Super. 551, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1117 (Pa. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal is premature since no judgment was entered in the Court below, and for this reason the appeal must be quashed.

The record is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County without prejudice to the right to enter judgment on the verdict.

Appeal quashed and record remanded.

Wright, J., would remand for the entry of judgment and would affirm the judgment as so entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal is premature since no judgment was entered in the Court below, and for this reason the appeal must be quashed.

The record is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County without prejudice to the right to enter judgment on the verdict.

Appeal quashed and record remanded.

Wright, J., would remand for the entry of judgment and would affirm the judgment as so entered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 A.2d 76, 205 Pa. Super. 551, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kersey-manufacturing-co-v-rozic-pasuperct-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack