Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic

211 A.2d 76, 205 Pa. Super. 551, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1117
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 17, 1965·No. Appeal, No. 97·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The appeal is premature since no judgment was entered in the Court below, and for this reason the appeal must be quashed.

The record is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County without prejudice to the right to enter judgment on the verdict.

Appeal quashed and record remanded.

Wright, J., would remand for the entry of judgment and would affirm the judgment as so entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic, 211 A.2d 76, 205 Pa. Super. 551, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1117 (Pa. Ct. App. 1965).

211 A.2d 76 (Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carl v. Matzko
240 A.2d 561 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic
222 A.2d 713 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)
Crawford v. Manhattan Life Insurance
215 A.2d 299 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Kersey Manufacturing Co. v. Rozic
215 A.2d 323 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Bodick v. Harcliff Mining Co.
214 A.2d 735 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)