Kerr v. Kerr

6 A.D.2d 807, 175 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5638
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 1958
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 6 A.D.2d 807 (Kerr v. Kerr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kerr v. Kerr, 6 A.D.2d 807, 175 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

In an action by a husband to annul a marriage in which his wife interposed a counterclaim for a separation, the appeal is from an order denying his motion to open his default and to set aside the default judgment entered June 3, 1957 which dismissed his complaint and granted a separation on the counterclaim. Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted, on condition that appellant shall within 30 days after the service of a copy of the order hereon satisfy the judgment, entered April 17, 1957, in the amount of $2,450 for arrears of temporary alimony and counsel fees; otherwise order affirmed, without costs. Under the liberal policy of vacating defaults in matrimonial actions, the circumstances which gave rise to this default judgment justify the granting of appellant’s motion to open his default. (Vanderhorst v. Vanderhorst, 282 App. Div. 312; Quaid v. Quaid, 2 A D 2d 768.) However, in view Of appellant’s failure to comply with the order directing the payment of temporary alimony and counsel fees, we deem it necessary to impose the above-mentioned condition. Furthermore, as considerable time has elapsed since the entry of the judgment for arrears of temporary alimony and counsel fees during which time additional alimony has accrued and is unpaid, this determination is without prejudice to any application by respondent, if she be so advised, with respect thereto, [808]*808and without prejudice to a cross motion by appellant, if he be so advised, to vacate or modify the order fixing the alimony for such subsequent period. The application, if made, should be made promptly. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perreca v. Perreca
113 Misc. 2d 591 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Iovino v. Iovino
74 A.D.2d 864 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Levy v. Levy
67 A.D.2d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Hewlett v. Hewlett
63 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Rizzo v. Rizzo
50 A.D.2d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Hegarty v. Hegarty
48 A.D.2d 891 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.2d 807, 175 N.Y.S.2d 240, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerr-v-kerr-nyappdiv-1958.