Kerr v. Kerr

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kerr v. Kerr

12 A.D.2d 606, 208 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6555

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 13, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 606 (Kerr v. Kerr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kerr v. Kerr, 12 A.D.2d 606, 208 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on September. 19, 1960, awarding plaintiff alimony pendente lite and a counsel fee in an action for separation unanimously modified on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of fixing the temporary alimony at $45 per week and the counsel fee at $400; and as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the allowance of alimony pendente lite (and counsel fee), upon the papers submitted on the motion, was excessive. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on September. 19, 1960, awarding plaintiff alimony pendente lite and a counsel fee in an action for separation unanimously modified on the law and on the facts and in the exercise of discretion to the extent of fixing the temporary alimony at $45 per week and the counsel fee at $400; and as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the allowance of alimony pendente lite (and counsel fee), upon the papers submitted on the motion, was excessive. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 606, 208 N.Y.S.2d 455, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerr-v-kerr-nyappdiv-1960.