Kerins v. Vassar College

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kerins v. Vassar College

293 A.D.2d 515, 739 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3517

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 8, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 293 A.D.2d 515 (Kerins v. Vassar College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kerins v. Vassar College, 293 A.D.2d 515, 739 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated September 18, 2001, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Vassar College which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, that branch of the motion which is for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against the respondent [516]*516is denied, and that cause of action is reinstated against the respondent.

There are issues of fact, inter alia, as to whether the cracked pane of glass on the subject double doors constituted a sharp projection as contemplated under 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (e) (1) and (2) (see Kerins v Vassar Coll., 293 AD2d 514 [decided herewith]). Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated September 18, 2001, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Vassar College which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, that branch of the motion which is for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 241 (6) insofar as asserted against the respondent [516]*516is denied, and that cause of action is reinstated against the respondent.

There are issues of fact, inter alia, as to whether the cracked pane of glass on the subject double doors constituted a sharp projection as contemplated under 12 NYCRR 23-1.7 (e) (1) and (2) (see Kerins v Vassar Coll., 293 AD2d 514 [decided herewith]). Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 515, 739 N.Y.S.2d 829, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kerins-v-vassar-college-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack