Kenyon v. Goodall & Co.

California Supreme Court

Kenyon v. Goodall & Co.

3 Cal. 257

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1853

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 Cal. 257 (Kenyon v. Goodall & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kenyon v. Goodall & Co., 3 Cal. 257 (Cal. 1853).

Pincite

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.

The referee erred in his estimate of the damages. The loss of time, value of services, and wages of employees, caused by the failure of the respondents to perform their contract, are damages [260]*260by no means remote, but on the contrary strictly proximate and immediate. They ought to have been considered and allowed. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heydenfeldt, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court. Murray, Chief Justice, concurred.

The referee erred in his estimate of the damages. The loss of time, value of services, and wages of employees, caused by the failure of the respondents to perform their contract, are damages [260]*260by no means remote, but on the contrary strictly proximate and immediate. They ought to have been considered and allowed. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cal. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenyon-v-goodall-co-cal-1853.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack