Kentucky v. Stincer

479 U.S. 1303, 107 S. Ct. 7, 93 L. Ed. 2d 235, 55 U.S.L.W. 3279, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 5341
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 15, 1986
DocketA-274 (86-572)
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 479 U.S. 1303 (Kentucky v. Stincer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kentucky v. Stincer, 479 U.S. 1303, 107 S. Ct. 7, 93 L. Ed. 2d 235, 55 U.S.L.W. 3279, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 5341 (1986).

Opinion

Justice Scalia, Circuit Justice.

I doubt the conclusion of the Kentucky Supreme Court that the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment gives an accused child molester the right to be present at the hearing inquiring into the competency of his child victim to testify. I see, moreover, at least a “fair prospect” that a majority of this Court would find that conclusion erroneous. See Rostker v. Goldberg, 448 U. S. 1306, 1308 (1980) (Brennan, J., in chambers). However, approximately one month after this case was decided the Kentucky Legislature enacted a statute providing specific procedures for securing the testimony of young victims of sexual abuse. See Ky. Rev. Stat. § 421.350 (Supp. 1986). The Supreme Court of Kentucky has upheld the validity of that statute, even though it does not require presence of the accused at the competency hearing. See Commonwealth v. Willis, 716 S. W. 2d 224 (1986). Since, therefore, it is unlikely that the issue presented by this case will arise again in Kentucky, and since I am unaware of any other State which has resolved the issue as did the Kentucky Supreme Court, see, e. g., State v. Taylor, 103 N. M. 189, 195, 704 P. 2d 443, 449 (App. 1985); Moll v. State, 351 N. W. 2d 639, 644 (Minn. App. 1984); People v. *1304 Breitweiser, 38 Ill. App. 3d 1066, 1067-1068, 349 N. E. 2d 454, 455-456 (1976); State v. Ritchey, 107 Ariz. 552, 555, 490 P. 2d 558, 561 (1971), I cannot discern “a ‘reasonable probability’ that four Justices will . . . [vote] to grant certiorari . . ." Rostker v. Goldberg, supra, at 1308 (citations omitted). The application for stay of the Commonwealth of Kentucky is accordingly

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ridling v. State
72 S.W.3d 466 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2002)
Bell v. State
757 S.W.2d 937 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1988)
State v. Cooper
353 S.E.2d 451 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
479 U.S. 1303, 107 S. Ct. 7, 93 L. Ed. 2d 235, 55 U.S.L.W. 3279, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 5341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kentucky-v-stincer-scotus-1986.