Kent v. Consumers Co.

170 S.E. 202, 47 Ga. App. 213, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 348
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 14, 1933
Docket22799
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 170 S.E. 202 (Kent v. Consumers Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kent v. Consumers Co., 170 S.E. 202, 47 Ga. App. 213, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 348 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Guerry, J.

A petition by a mother in an action for damages on account of the negligent homicide of her minor child is fatally defective if it fails to allege both that she was at the time of the homicide dependent on the child and that the child contributed to her support. Clay v. Central Railroad &c. Co., 84 Ga. 345 (10 S. E. 967); Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Swann, 19 Ga. App. 691 (91 S. E. 1068) ; Smith v. Hatcher, 102 Ga. 158 (29 S. E. 162) ; Owens v. Anchor Duck Mills, 34 Ga. App. 315 (129 S. E. 301); Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Anderson, 34 Ga. App. 435 (129 S. E. 896). The petition in-the present case failed to allege dependency, and there was no offer to amend to show dependency. The court did not err in sustaining the demurrer. Southern Ry. Co. v. Dickson, 138 Ga. 371 (75 S. E. 462).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rogers v. Hime
46 S.E.2d 367 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Patterson
42 S.E.2d 171 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Wilson v. Pollard
8 S.E.2d 380 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Clements v. Pollard
186 S.E. 587 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Brawner v. Bussell
179 S.E. 231 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.E. 202, 47 Ga. App. 213, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-consumers-co-gactapp-1933.