Kent v. Civil Service Commission
This text of 236 N.E.2d 87 (Kent v. Civil Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The demurrer to the petition for writ of mandamus to require reversal of the respondents’ action on the petitioner’s application and examination was rightly sustained. The respondents having acted, mandamus is not an appropriate remedy. Howe v. Attorney Gen. 325 Mass. 268, 270, and cases cited. Harding v. Commissioner of Ins. 352 Mass. 478, 480.
Order sustaining demurrer affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
236 N.E.2d 87, 354 Mass. 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kent-v-civil-service-commission-mass-1968.