Hersey v. Board of Selectmen

281 N.E.2d 232, 361 Mass. 867
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 8, 1972·Published

Opinion

A discharged police officer of the town of Monson has brought this petition for a writ of mandamus for a hearing on charges which caused the board of selectmen to dismiss him. This action followed a hearing by the board set for a time certain which was somewhat delayed. The petitioner left with his counsel and witnesses and did not participate in the hearing. After hearing, the petition was denied and the petitioner appealed. There was no error. In similar matters where action has already been taken, as was the case here, we have hitherto held that mandamus is not an appropriate remedy. Howe v. Attorney Gen. 325 Mass. 268, 270. Harding v. Commissioner of Ins. 352 Mass. 478, 480. Kent v. Civil Serv. Commn. 354 Mass. 757.

Order for judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hersey v. Board of Selectmen, 281 N.E.2d 232, 361 Mass. 867 (Mass. 1972).

281 N.E.2d 232 (Hersey v. Board of Selectmen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howe v. Attorney General
90 N.E.2d 316 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Harding v. Commissioner of Insurance
225 N.E.2d 903 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1967)
Kent v. Civil Service Commission
236 N.E.2d 87 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1968)