Keno Rolland v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 19, 2012
DocketA12A0319
StatusPublished

This text of Keno Rolland v. State (Keno Rolland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Keno Rolland v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,_________________ June 19, 2012

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A12A0319. ROLLAND v. THE STATE.

Keno Rolland was charged in a three-count accusation with driving under the influence of alcohol to the extent it was less safe for him to drive, driving under the influence of alcohol with an unlawful blood-alcohol concentration, and failing to maintain a single lane. A jury found him guilty of all three counts. The trial court imposed a 12-month sentence for the count of driving under the influence with an unlawful blood-alcohol concentration, but entered no sentence on the other two counts. This appeal followed. “[W]hen multiple counts of an [accusation] are tried together and the trial court does not enter a written sentence on one or more of the counts, the case is still pending in the trial court and is not a final judgment under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1).” Keller v. State, 275 Ga. 680, 681 (571 SE2d 806) (2002). Because the trial court did not enter a sentence on two of the counts of which Rolland was found guilty, this case is still pending in the trial court and is not ripe for appeal. Id.; Bass v. State, 284 Ga. App. 331, 332 (643 SE2d 851) (2007). Accordingly, the case is hereby remanded to the trial court. “With respect to each of the [three] counts of which [Rolland] was found guilty, the trial court is hereby directed to either (a) enter a written sentence, or (b) enter a written notation that the count merged into another for purposes of sentencing - thereby, in writing, disposing of all [the] counts of which [Rolland] was found guilty. After such entry, the case may be transmitted to this court for re- docketing because the notice of appeal, prematurely filed, then will have ripened. [Cits.]” Bass, supra. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 06/19/2012 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,_________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keller v. State
571 S.E.2d 806 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2002)
Bass v. State
643 S.E.2d 851 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Keno Rolland v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keno-rolland-v-state-gactapp-2012.