Kenny v. Byrne
This text of 383 A.2d 428 (Kenny v. Byrne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WILLIAM E. KENNY AND CATHERINE McGOVERN HAVRILSKY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BRENDAN T. BYRNE, GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY AND INDIVIDUALLY; WILLIAM F. HYLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY AND INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. William S. Greenberg argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Greenberg and Mellk, attorneys.)
Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Michael A. Santaniello, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).
Mr. Sanford Kluger argued the cause for amicus curiae Common Cause (Mr. Henry Ramer, attorney).
*459 PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
For affirmance Chief Justices HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and HANDLER 7.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
383 A.2d 428, 75 N.J. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kenny-v-byrne-nj-1978.