Kenneth Awe v. Harold Clarke

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7137

KENNETH VALENTINE AWE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE; RANDALL MATHENA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:14-cv-00248-JLK-RSB)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth V. Awe, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Valentine Awe appeals the district court’s

orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)

complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)

(2012), and denying his motion to alter or amend. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Awe v.

Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-00248-JLK-RSB (W.D. Va. July 3 & 18, 2014).

We deny Awe’s motion for counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED