Kenneth Awe v. Harold Clarke

577 F. App'x 159
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kenneth Awe v. Harold Clarke. Read the opinion of the Court — 535 F. App'x 228
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2014·No. 14-6531·Unpublished

Opinion

*160 Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Awe seeks to appeal the district court order dismissing without prejudice his action brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12132-12134 (2012), for failure to state a claim. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Awe seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order, as Awe may be able to save his action by amending his complaint to cure the pleading deficiencies that were identified by the district court. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenneth Awe v. Harold Clarke, 577 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2014).

577 F. App'x 159 (Kenneth Awe v. Harold Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related