Kennedy v. State

3 S.W. 480, 22 Tex. Ct. App. 693, 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 23
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 26, 1887·No. No. 2100·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Willson, Judge.

It is alleged in the information that the' offense was committed on the fifteenth day of November, 1884, and the information was presented and filed on said day. There is no allegation that the offense was committed anterior to the filing of the information.

One of the statutory requisites of an information is, “that the time of the commission of an offense be some date anterior to the filing of the information.” This requisite must be apparent from the information itself, and the complaint upon which the information is founded can not be resorted to to supply it. We must hold the information to be fatally defective, notwithstanding the complaint shows that it was filed subsequent to the commission of the offense. (Code Crim. Proc., Art. 430; Williams v. The State, 12 Texas Ct. App., 226; Wilson v. The State, 15 Texas Ct. App., 150; Goddard v. The State, 14 Texas Ct. App., 566.)

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennedy v. State, 3 S.W. 480, 22 Tex. Ct. App. 693, 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 23 (Tex. Ct. App. 1887).

3 S.W. 480 (Kennedy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bumguardner v. State
237 S.W.2d 308 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Martini v. State
205 S.W.2d 988 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1947)
Hoot v. State
194 S.W.2d 97 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Cobb v. State
139 S.W.2d 272 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Meadows v. State
128 S.W.2d 414 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Phariss v. State
128 S.W.2d 415 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Irlbeck v. State
26 S.W.2d 276 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)