Irlbeck v. State
This text of 26 S.W.2d 276 (Irlbeck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment a fine of five hundred dollars and confinement in jail for one hundred days.
The information was filed on July 15, 1929, it being alleged therein that the offense was committed on July 16, 1929, which was a day subsequent to the date of the filing of the information. Appellant made a motion to quash on the ground that it appeared upon the face of the information that the offense had been committed subsequent to the date upon which said information was filed. The motion should have been sustained. The statute requires that the time of the commission of the offense be some date anterior to the *658 filing of the information. Art. 414, C. C. P. This requisite must be apparent from the information itself. The complaint upon which the information is filed cannot be resorted to to supply it. Kennedy v. State, 3 S. W. 480; Winn v. State, 223 S. W. 230; Williams v. State, 12 Tex. App. 226; Goddard v. State, 14 Tex. App. 566; Wilson v. State, 15 Tex. App. 150.
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 S.W.2d 276, 114 Tex. Crim. 657, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irlbeck-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.