Kennedy v. Morgan

57 Vt. 46
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJanuary 15, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 57 Vt. 46 (Kennedy v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kennedy v. Morgan, 57 Vt. 46 (Vt. 1885).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Powers, J.

Negligence is a shortage of legal duty.

All facts essential to the creation of the duty must be alleged in a declaration charging negligence upon such facts. If the facts stated in the declaration do not raise the duty, the duty cannot be established by proof of other facts not stated. Allegation as well as proof is the foundation of a right of recovery. If the pleader merely alleges the duty in his declaration, he states a conclusion of law; whereas the elementary rule is, that the facts from which the duty springs must be spread upon the record so that the court can see that the duty is made out.

No intendments are made in favor of a declaration challenged by a demurrer.

[49]*49The defendant was engaged in a lawful work. No relation, obligation, or duty, to the plaintiff’s son, is alleged; nor does it appear that he had any knowledge of the son’s presence in the vicinity of his work.

Nothing actionable then is disclosed in the declaration. 2 Addison Torts, 1147; Gould Pl. c. 3, s. 7; Fay v. Kent, 55 Vt. 557.

There was no error in the judgment below; but the same is pro forma reversed and repleader awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glidden v. Bath Iron Works Corp.
54 A.2d 528 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1947)
Ouelette v. Miller
183 A. 341 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1936)
Texas-Louisiana Power Co. v. Webster
59 S.W.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Humphrey v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.
139 A. 440 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1927)
Sessions v. Foster
123 A. 898 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1924)
Dent v. Bellows Falls & Saxtons River Street Railway Co.
116 A. 83 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1922)
Bottom's v. Hawks
84 Vt. 370 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1911)
Adriance, Platt & Co. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
105 A.D. 33 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Pittsfield Cottonwear Manufacturing Co. v. Pittsfield Shoe Co.
60 L.R.A. 116 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.
125 Ala. 237 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)
Boardman v. Creighton
93 Me. 1 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1899)
Devino v. Central Vermont R. R.
63 Vt. 98 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Vt. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kennedy-v-morgan-vt-1885.