Kennedy v. Morgan

57 Vt. 46
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 15, 1885·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Powers, J.

Negligence is a shortage of legal duty.

All facts essential to the creation of the duty must be alleged in a declaration charging negligence upon such facts. If the facts stated in the declaration do not raise the duty, the duty cannot be established by proof of other facts not stated. Allegation as well as proof is the foundation of a right of recovery. If the pleader merely alleges the duty in his declaration, he states a conclusion of law; whereas the elementary rule is, that the facts from which the duty springs must be spread upon the record so that the court can see that the duty is made out.

No intendments are made in favor of a declaration challenged by a demurrer.

[49]*49The defendant was engaged in a lawful work. No relation, obligation, or duty, to the plaintiff’s son, is alleged; nor does it appear that he had any knowledge of the son’s presence in the vicinity of his work.

Nothing actionable then is disclosed in the declaration. 2 Addison Torts, 1147; Gould Pl. c. 3, s. 7; Fay v. Kent, 55 Vt. 557.

There was no error in the judgment below; but the same is pro forma reversed and repleader awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kennedy v. Morgan, 57 Vt. 46 (Vt. 1885).

57 Vt. 46 (Kennedy v. Morgan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glidden v. Bath Iron Works Corp.
54 A.2d 528 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1947)
Ouelette v. Miller
183 A. 341 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1936)
Texas-Louisiana Power Co. v. Webster
59 S.W.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Humphrey v. Twin State Gas & Electric Co.
139 A. 440 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1927)
Sessions v. Foster
123 A. 898 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1924)
Dent v. Bellows Falls & Saxtons River Street Railway Co.
116 A. 83 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1922)
Bottom's v. Hawks
84 Vt. 370 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1911)
Adriance, Platt & Co. v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
105 A.D. 33 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Pittsfield Cottonwear Manufacturing Co. v. Pittsfield Shoe Co.
60 L.R.A. 116 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1902)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Marbury Lumber Co.
125 Ala. 237 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1899)
Boardman v. Creighton
93 Me. 1 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1899)
Devino v. Central Vermont R. R.
63 Vt. 98 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1890)