Kendrick v. McDonough
973 So. 2d 515, 2007 WL 4372826
This text of 973 So. 2d 515 (Kendrick v. McDonough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kendrick v. McDonough, 973 So. 2d 515, 2007 WL 4372826 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
Kenneth James KENDRICK, Petitioner,
v.
James R. McDONOUGH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*516 Kenneth James Kendrick, pro se, Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for replevin are denied as procedurally barred. See Baldwin v. Crosby, 905 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).
BROWNING, C.J., KAHN and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baldwin v. Crosby
905 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
973 So. 2d 515, 2007 WL 4372826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kendrick-v-mcdonough-fladistctapp-2007.