Kendall v. Clark

10 Cal. 17, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 178
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Field J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The plaintiff sets out that Clark, who was sheriff of Calaveras, under an execution against plaintiff J. Kendall, levied on and sold certain property, which was the homestead of the plaintiff, and claims damages in two thousand dollars.

From the complaint itself it is clear that no damage has or can result from such sale. If the property sold was a homestead, the sheriff’s deed conveyed nothing; the purchaser at such sale could acquire no right to the property, and the plaintiff suffer no injury-

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kendall v. Clark, 10 Cal. 17, 1858 Cal. LEXIS 178 (Cal. 1858).

10 Cal. 17 (Kendall v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
S.D. California, 2026
(HC) Larue v. Matteson
E.D. California, 2023
Van Bogaert v. Avery
271 Cal. App. 2d 492 (California Court of Appeal, 1969)
Johnson v. Twichell
101 N.W. 318 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1904)
De Deffeliz v. Pico
46 Cal. 289 (California Supreme Court, 1873)