Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance
This text of 2002 Ohio 7101 (Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
{¶ 1} The following questions have been certified to us by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII:
{¶ 2} “(1) Are the requirements of Linko v. Indemnity Ins. Co. [2000], 90 Ohio St.3d [445, 739 N.E.2d 338], relative to an offer of UM/UIM coverage, applicable to a policy of insurance written after enactment of [1997] HB 261 and before [2001] SB 97?
{¶ 3} “(2) If the Linko requirements are applicable, does, under [1997] HB 261, a signed rejection act as an effective declination of UM/UIM coverage, where there is no other evidence, oral or documentary, of an offer of coverage?”
{¶ 4} We answer certified question No. 1 in the affirmative and certified question No. 2 in the negative.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2002 Ohio 7101, 781 N.E.2d 196, 98 Ohio St. 3d 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemper-v-michigan-millers-mutual-insurance-ohio-2002.