Kemp v. Town of Hazlehurst

80 Miss. 443
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1902·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

'None of the objections to the validity of the bonds are well taken. They are perfectly valid. The proceedings of the mayor and board of aldermen show the utmost care, and are characterized by the most scrupulous observance of the law. The only thing we deem it worth while to say is that whenever the proposed bonds “exceed in amount seven per centum of the assessed value of the taxable property of the municipality” there must be an election. That was expressly decided in Town of Clarksdale v. Broaddus, 77 Miss., at page 672 (28 So., 955), last sentence of the opinion. But there was an election here, duly held. The “official ballots” provided for in § 3032 of code of 1892 are to be used in voting for municipal officers. They are not necessary in elections of this kind. There is nothing else worthy of remark by us. The reporter will set out all the objections, for the guidance of municipal authorities.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kemp v. Town of Hazlehurst, 80 Miss. 443 (Mich. 1902).

80 Miss. 443 (Kemp v. Town of Hazlehurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Independent Paving Co. v. City of Bay St. Louis
74 F.2d 961 (Fifth Circuit, 1935)
Board of Ed. of Oklahoma City v. Woodworth
1923 OK 135 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Rosenstock v. Board of Supervisors
72 So. 876 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1916)
State ex rel. Pike County v. Gordon
188 S.W. 88 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1916)
Briggs v. City of Raleigh
81 S.E. 1084 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Tulloch v. City of Seattle
124 P. 481 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)
Blaine v. Hamilton
116 P. 1076 (Washington Supreme Court, 1911)
Clark v. City of Los Angeles
116 P. 966 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
State ex rel. School District v. Gordon
122 S.W. 1008 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1909)
Linn v. City of Omaha
107 N.W. 983 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1906)