Kemp v. Seattle

279 U.S. 825, 49 S. Ct. 482
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 27, 1929·No. No. 791·Published·Cited by 25 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal and writ of error are dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the appeal and writ of error as an application for certiorari the same is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kemp v. Seattle, 279 U.S. 825, 49 S. Ct. 482 (1929).

279 U.S. 825 (Kemp v. Seattle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doan v. INS
990 F. Supp. 744 (E.D. Missouri, 1997)
Hsu v. Ryan
103 F.3d 139 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lanzaro
658 A.2d 282 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1995)
Romero v. Consulate of US, Barranquilla, Colombia
860 F. Supp. 319 (E.D. Virginia, 1994)
Adams v. Baker
909 F.2d 643 (First Circuit, 1990)
Ben-Issa v. Reagan
645 F. Supp. 1556 (W.D. Michigan, 1986)
Pena v. Kissinger
409 F. Supp. 1182 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Hermina Sague v. United States
416 F. Supp. 217 (D. Puerto Rico, 1976)
Heyward v. Republic National Life Insurance Co.
527 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Mandel v. Mitchell
325 F. Supp. 620 (E.D. New York, 1971)
Gates v. New York Life Insurance
174 N.W.2d 862 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)
Fisher v. Becker
32 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Licea-Gomez v. Pilliod
193 F. Supp. 577 (N.D. Illinois, 1960)
State v. Stickney
5 N.W.2d 351 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)