Kemp v. Seattle
279 U.S. 825, 49 S. Ct. 482
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 27, 1929
DocketNo. 791
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases
This text of 279 U.S. 825 (Kemp v. Seattle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kemp v. Seattle, 279 U.S. 825, 49 S. Ct. 482 (1929).
Opinion
The appeal and writ of error are dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the appeal and writ of error as an application for certiorari the same is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Doan v. INS
990 F. Supp. 744 (E.D. Missouri, 1997)
Hsu v. Ryan
103 F.3d 139 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lanzaro
658 A.2d 282 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1995)
Zimeng Shen v. United States Consulate General at Shanghai, China
866 F. Supp. 779 (S.D. New York, 1994)
Romero v. Consulate of US, Barranquilla, Colombia
860 F. Supp. 319 (E.D. Virginia, 1994)
Adams v. Baker
909 F.2d 643 (First Circuit, 1990)
Ben-Issa v. Reagan
645 F. Supp. 1556 (W.D. Michigan, 1986)
Li Hing of Hong Kong, Inc., and Yee Lee Soon v. Burton Levin, Counsel General of the United States of America for Hong Kong
800 F.2d 970 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Unification Church A/K/A Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity v. The Attorney General for the United States. Keiko Asai v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
581 F.2d 870 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)
Unification Church v. Attorney General for the United States
581 F.2d 870 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)
Pena v. Kissinger
409 F. Supp. 1182 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Hermina Sague v. United States
416 F. Supp. 217 (D. Puerto Rico, 1976)
Heyward v. Republic National Life Insurance Co.
527 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Mandel v. Mitchell
325 F. Supp. 620 (E.D. New York, 1971)
Gates v. New York Life Insurance
174 N.W.2d 862 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)
Eugenio Loza-Bedoya v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
410 F.2d 343 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
Fisher v. Becker
32 A.D.2d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Licea-Gomez v. Pilliod
193 F. Supp. 577 (N.D. Illinois, 1960)
Frank Ernest Ablett v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States
240 F.2d 625 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)
State v. Stickney
5 N.W.2d 351 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
279 U.S. 825, 49 S. Ct. 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemp-v-seattle-scotus-1929.