Kemmerer v. Kemmerer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kemmerer v. Kemmerer

386 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17471

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 22, 1980

DocketNo. 80-2

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 386 So. 2d 1248 (Kemmerer v. Kemmerer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kemmerer v. Kemmerer, 386 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17471 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Under the circumstances presented in the record, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant the wife and minor children of the parties the right [1249]*1249to live in the marital home until the wife dies or remarries, or the younger child reaches majority. Smith v. Smith, 378 So.2d 11, 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Alford v. Alford, 364 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Bailey v. Bailey, 361 So.2d 204, 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Singer v. Singer, 342 So.2d 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); McNaughton v. McNaughton, 332 So.2d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 345 So.2d 424 (Fla.1977); Plant v. Plant, 320 So.2d 455 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, dismissed, 336 So.2d 107, 341 So.2d 292 (Fla.1976); Reisman v. Reisman, 314 So.2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 336 So.2d 107 (Fla.1976); Venzer v. Venzer, 308 So.2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Upon remand, the final judgment of dissolution under review shall be appropriately amended to reflect this determination.

We find no error in the other challenged provisions of the judgment below. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Under the circumstances presented in the record, we hold that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant the wife and minor children of the parties the right [1249]*1249to live in the marital home until the wife dies or remarries, or the younger child reaches majority. Smith v. Smith, 378 So.2d 11, 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Alford v. Alford, 364 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Bailey v. Bailey, 361 So.2d 204, 205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Singer v. Singer, 342 So.2d 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); McNaughton v. McNaughton, 332 So.2d 673 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 345 So.2d 424 (Fla.1977); Plant v. Plant, 320 So.2d 455 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, dismissed, 336 So.2d 107, 341 So.2d 292 (Fla.1976); Reisman v. Reisman, 314 So.2d 783 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 336 So.2d 107 (Fla.1976); Venzer v. Venzer, 308 So.2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Upon remand, the final judgment of dissolution under review shall be appropriately amended to reflect this determination.

We find no error in the other challenged provisions of the judgment below. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla.1977); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

386 So. 2d 1248, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kemmerer-v-kemmerer-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack