K.E.M. v. P.C.S.
23 A.3d 1050, 611 Pa. 196, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1527
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, are:
1. Whether the Superior Court of Pennsylvania erred by affirming the lower court finding that paternity by estoppel applies in the present case and precludes the petitioner/plaintif'f/mother from pursuing paternity or support against the respondent/putative father?
2. Whether the doctrine of paternity by estoppel, as applied in Pennsylvania, should be maintained, revised, or abrogated in its entirety?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
K.E.M. v. P.C.S., 23 A.3d 1050, 611 Pa. 196, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1527 (Pa. 2011).
23 A.3d 1050 (K.E.M. v. P.C.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
K.E.M. v. P.C.S.
38 A.3d 798 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)