K.E.M. v. P.C.S.
23 A.3d 1050
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, are:
1. Whether the Superior Court of Pennsylvania erred by affirming the lower court finding that paternity by estoppel applies in the present case and precludes the petitioner/plaintiff/mother from pursuing paternity or support against the respondent/putative father?
2. Whether the doctrine of paternity by estoppel, as applied in Pennsylvania, should be maintained, revised, or abrogated in its entirety?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
K.E.M. v. P.C.S., 23 A.3d 1050 (Pa. 2011).
23 A.3d 1050 (K.E.M. v. P.C.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
K.E.M. v. P.C.S.
38 A.3d 798 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)