Kelsey v. Merced Irrigation District
This text of 76 Cal. App. 799 (Kelsey v. Merced Irrigation District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by the intervener from an order striking out all the items of his memorandum of costs. The facts are in all respects the same in principle as those in Danley v. Merced Irr. Dist., ante, p. 58 [243 Pac. 676].
For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the order is reversed and the trial court is directed to hear and determine the questions raised by respondents’ motion to tax costs in accordance with the views expressed in that opinion.
A petition by respondents to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 25, 1926.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 Cal. App. 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelsey-v-merced-irrigation-district-calctapp-1925.