Kelly v. State
124 So. 2d 844, 239 Miss. 705, 1960 Miss. LEXIS 344
Opinion
This case presents purely a question of fact as there was testimony sharply conflicting and the jury had decided the case on this undisputed testimony. That being true, the judgment of the lower court should be, and it is, hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kelly v. State, 124 So. 2d 844, 239 Miss. 705, 1960 Miss. LEXIS 344 (Mich. 1960).
124 So. 2d 844 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Green v. Pendergraft
179 So. 2d 831 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Smith
164 So. 2d 462 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1964)
Straight v. Brinson
149 So. 2d 515 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Martin v. Illinois Central Railroad
149 So. 2d 344 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1963)
Baudry v. Faulkner Concrete Pipe Co.
145 So. 2d 468 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1962)