Kelly v. GERIATRIC & MEDICAL CENTERS, INC.

685 A.2d 943, 147 N.J. 42, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 1091
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 19, 1996·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 287 N.J.Super. 567, 671 A.2d 631 (1996).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed^-None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. GERIATRIC & MEDICAL CENTERS, INC., 685 A.2d 943, 147 N.J. 42, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 1091 (N.J. 1996).

685 A.2d 943 (Kelly v. GERIATRIC & MEDICAL CENTERS, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eric G. Hanisko v. Billy Casper Golf Management, Inc.
98 A.3d 1192 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)
Walrond v. County of Somerset
888 A.2d 491 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
Gonzalez v. Ideal Tile Importing Co.
853 A.2d 298 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2004)
Marino v. Industrial Crating Co.
358 F.3d 241 (Third Circuit, 2004)
Roma v. United States
344 F.3d 352 (Third Circuit, 2003)
Harris v. Mitchell
818 A.2d 443 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
Scott v. Altmar, Inc.
38 P.3d 673 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2002)
Anderson v. Tuboscope Vetco, Inc.
9 P.3d 1013 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2000)
Alloway v. Bradlees, Inc.
723 A.2d 960 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999)
Gore v. Hepworth
720 A.2d 350 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
Dickstein v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
685 A.2d 943 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)