KELLY v. GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY

120 S.E.2d 329, 216 Ga. 834, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 356
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 22, 1961·No. 21220·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mobley, Justice.

If an answer by the Supreme Court of a question certified to it by the Court of Appeals would constitute a decision of the main case, the question cannot, under the Constitution, be answered. Gunby v. Roberts, 205 Ga. 346 (53 S. E. 2d 370); Lynch v. Southern Express Co., 146 Ga. 68 (96 S. E. 527). A certified question of law and fact will not be answered and, even if the question certified is one of law only, it will not be answered if such answer would necessarily control the decision of the case. Johnston v. Travelers Insurance Co., 183 Ga. 229 (188 S. E. 27); English v. Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga. 817 (105 S. E. 613). The question certified in this case is determinative of the outcome of the case and, in addition, in order to adequately and intelligently answer the question, this court would be required to look beyond the legal issues involved to the factual background of the case under consideration. For the reasons above stated, we must respectfully decline to answer the question certified.

Answer declined.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELLY v. GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, 120 S.E.2d 329, 216 Ga. 834, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 356 (Ga. 1961).

120 S.E.2d 329 (KELLY v. GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Naar v. Naar.
827 S.E.2d 711 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019)
In the Interest of J. F.
797 S.E.2d 921 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)
In the Interest of J.F., a Child
Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017
In the Interest of J. F., a Child
789 S.E.2d 274 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)
Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc.
219 S.E.2d 115 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Raif v. State
135 S.E.2d 375 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)