KELLY v. GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY
This text of 120 S.E.2d 329 (KELLY v. GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If an answer by the Supreme Court of a question certified to it by the Court of Appeals would constitute a decision of the main case, the question cannot, under the Constitution, be answered. Gunby v. Roberts, 205 Ga. 346 (53 S. E. 2d 370); Lynch v. Southern Express Co., 146 Ga. 68 (96 S. E. 527). A certified question of law and fact will not be answered and, even if the question certified is one of law only, it will not be answered if such answer would necessarily control the decision of the case. Johnston v. Travelers Insurance Co., 183 Ga. 229 (188 S. E. 27); English v. Rosenkrantz, 150 Ga. 817 (105 S. E. 613). The question certified in this case is determinative of the outcome of the case and, in addition, in order to adequately and intelligently answer the question, this court would be required to look beyond the legal issues involved to the factual background of the case under consideration. For the reasons above stated, we must respectfully decline to answer the question certified.
Answer declined.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 S.E.2d 329, 216 Ga. 834, 1961 Ga. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-georgia-casualty-surety-company-ga-1961.