Kelly v. Carborundum Company
470 A.2d 969, 504 Pa. 238, 1984 Pa. LEXIS 218
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 6, 1984·No. Petition 355 W.D. Allocatur Docket 1982·Published·Cited by 12 cases
Opinions
ORDER
The petition for allowance of appeal is granted.
In accordance with Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, 502 Pa. 101, 465 A.2d 609 (1983), the order of the Superior Court, 307 Pa.Super. 361, 453 A.2d 624 (1982), is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kelly v. Carborundum Company, 470 A.2d 969, 504 Pa. 238, 1984 Pa. LEXIS 218 (Pa. 1984).
470 A.2d 969 (Kelly v. Carborundum Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carcaise v. Cemex, Inc.
217 F. Supp. 2d 603 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2002)
Smith v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
707 A.2d 604 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance Companies
688 A.2d 177 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Christiansen v. Silfies
667 A.2d 396 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Fulmer v. Duquesne Light Co.
543 A.2d 1100 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)
Elder v. Orluck
515 A.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Boris v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
515 A.2d 21 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Rivera v. Westinghouse Elevator Co.
508 A.2d 264 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Baker v. Magnetic Analysis Corp.
500 A.2d 470 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1985)
Kelly v. Carborundum Company
470 A.2d 969 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)