Kelly v. Barreto
This text of Kelly v. Barreto (Kelly v. Barreto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
__________________________________________ ) KEVIN R. KELLY ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-900 (PLF) ) KAREN G. MILLS, Administrator, United States ) Small Business Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
The Court previously dismissed without prejudice three of the counts in plaintiff’s
first amended complaint, see Kelly v. Barreto, Civil Action No. 05-900, Order at 1 (D.D.C.
September 5, 2006), and granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on plaintiff’s age discrimination claim. See Kelly v. Hairston,
605 F. Supp. 2d 175 (D.D.C. 2009). After a bench trial, and for the reasons given in the Opinion,
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law issued this same day, it is hereby
ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered for defendant on plaintiff’s
discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment for the defendant on all claims
and remove this case from the docket of the Court. This is a final appealable order. See FED . R.
APP . P. 4(a).
SO ORDERED.
/s/______________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: January 6, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kelly v. Barreto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-barreto-dcd-2010.