Kelly Ann McDougall v. County of Ventura

38 F.4th 1162
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kelly Ann McDougall v. County of Ventura. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 F.4th 1095
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 29, 2022·No. 20-56220·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 29 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELLY ANN CHAKOV MCDOUGALL, No. 20-56220 an individual and as trustee; JULIANA GARCIA, an individual; SECOND D.C. No. AMENDMENT FOUNDATION; 2:20-cv-02927-CBM-AS CALIFORNIA GUN RIGHTS Central District of California, FOUNDATION; FIREARMS POLICY Los Angeles COALITION, INC., ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

COUNTY OF VENTURA; BILL AYUB; WILLIAM T. FOLEY; ROBERT LEVIN; VENTURA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH CARE AGENCY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and KLEINFELD, McKEOWN, CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, HURWITZ, FRIEDLAND, R. NELSON, MILLER, SANCHEZ and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

The district court’s judgment is vacated, and this case is remanded to the

district court for further proceedings consistent with the United States Supreme

Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ____

(2022).

The parties shall bear their own attorney’s fees, costs, and expenses. This

order constitutes the mandate of this court.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly Ann McDougall v. County of Ventura, 38 F.4th 1162 (9th Cir. 2022).

38 F.4th 1162 (Kelly Ann McDougall v. County of Ventura) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.