Kelly Ann McDougall v. County of Ventura

26 F.4th 1016
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 8, 2022·No. 20-56220·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 8 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELLY ANN CHAKOV MCDOUGALL, No. 20-56220 an individual; JULIANA GARCIA, an individual; SECOND AMENDMENT D.C. No. FOUNDATION; CALIFORNIA GUN 2:20-cv-02927-CBM-AS RIGHTS FOUNDATION; FIREARMS Central District of California, POLICY COALITION, INC., Los Angeles

Plaintiffs-Appellants, ORDER

v.

COUNTY OF VENTURA; BILL AYUB; WILLIAM T. FOLEY; ROBERT LEVIN; VENTURA COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH CARE AGENCY,

Defendants-Appellees.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly Ann McDougall v. County of Ventura, 26 F.4th 1016 (9th Cir. 2022).

26 F.4th 1016 (Kelly Ann McDougall v. County of Ventura) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andrew Teter v. Anne E. Lopez
125 F.4th 1301 (Ninth Circuit, 2025)