Kelliher v. Investment & Securities Co.

293 U.S. 519, 55 S. Ct. 105
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 8, 1934·No. No. 286·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is [520] dismissed (1) for the want of a substantial federal question (Commercial Bank v. Buckingham’s Executors, 5 How. 317, 342, 343; Boss v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 161, 162; Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Commission, 255 U. S. 445, 448, 449), and (2) for the want of a properly-presented federal question (Live Oak Water Users Assn, v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 357, 358; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U. S. 604). The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied.

Mr. M. M. Kelliher, Amy Kelliher, and Tena Marsh, pro se. Mr. Channing Wake-field for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelliher v. Investment & Securities Co., 293 U.S. 519, 55 S. Ct. 105 (1934).

293 U.S. 519 (Kelliher v. Investment & Securities Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ross v. Oregon
227 U.S. 150 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal
251 U.S. 179 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
261 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Live Oak Water Users' Ass'n v. Railroad Commission
269 U.S. 354 (Supreme Court, 1926)
Archerd v. Oregon
290 U.S. 604 (Supreme Court, 1934)