Archerd v. Oregon

290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 372
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 8, 1934·No. No. 602·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question. Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U.S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 251 U.S. 114, 117; Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Comm’n, 269 U.S. 354, 357, 358; (2) for the want of a reviewable judgment by the highest court of the State in which a decision could have been had. John v. Paullin, 231 U.S. 583, 587; Newman v. Gates, 204 U.S. 89, 95; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U.S. 101; Harrington v. Holler, 111 U.S. 796; and (3) for the want of a substantial federal question, Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U.S. 300, 311; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U.S. 29; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U.S. 191. Mandate stayed and motion for -leave to file petition for rehearing granted January 22, 1934.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 372 (1934).

290 U.S. 604 (Archerd v. Oregon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skipper v. Florida
293 U.S. 517 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Wade v. Jacksonville
293 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Kelliher v. Investment & Securities Co.
293 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1934)