Archerd v. Oregon
This text of 290 U.S. 604 (Archerd v. Oregon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question. Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U.S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 251 U.S. 114, 117; Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Comm’n, 269 U.S. 354, 357, 358; (2) for the want of a reviewable judgment by the highest court of the State in which a decision could have been had. John v. Paullin, 231 U.S. 583, 587; Newman v. Gates, 204 U.S. 89, 95; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U.S. 101; Harrington v. Holler, 111 U.S. 796; and (3) for the want of a substantial federal question, Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U.S. 300, 311; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U.S. 29; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U.S. 191. Mandate stayed and motion for -leave to file petition for rehearing granted January 22, 1934.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/archerd-v-oregon-scotus-1934.