Archerd v. Oregon

290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 372
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 8, 1934
DocketNo. 602
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 290 U.S. 604 (Archerd v. Oregon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Archerd v. Oregon, 290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 372 (1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed (1) for the want of a properly presented federal question. Godchaux v. Estopinal, 251 U.S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 251 U.S. 114, 117; Live Oak Water Users Assn. v. Railroad Comm’n, 269 U.S. 354, 357, 358; (2) for the want of a reviewable judgment by the highest court of the State in which a decision could have been had. John v. Paullin, 231 U.S. 583, 587; Newman v. Gates, 204 U.S. 89, 95; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co. v. McDonald, 214 U.S. 101; Harrington v. Holler, 111 U.S. 796; and (3) for the want of a substantial federal question, Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U.S. 300, 311; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U.S. 29; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U.S. 191. Mandate stayed and motion for -leave to file petition for rehearing granted January 22, 1934.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skipper v. Florida
293 U.S. 517 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Wade v. Jacksonville
293 U.S. 518 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Kelliher v. Investment & Securities Co.
293 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 U.S. 604, 54 S. Ct. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/archerd-v-oregon-scotus-1934.