Keliher v. Champion

358 Mass. 821
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 1, 1971·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration was sustained, “with leave to the plaintiff to file a motion ... to amend writ and declaration together with a copy of the proposed amendment.” Such motion was filed with a copy of a proposed amendment of the writ and declaration, and was denied after hearing. The plaintiff’s exception to this denial presents the sole question for decision. The motion was addressed to the discretion of the trial judge, and its denial, in the absence of findings, rulings, or requests for rulings (as was the case here) presents no question of law. Means v. Leveroni, 297 Mass. 61, 64. Urban v. Central Mass. Elec. Co. 301 Mass. 519, 524. Peterson v. Cadogan, 313 Mass. 133, 134. Durante v. Mezzetti, 332 Mass. 758.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keliher v. Champion, 358 Mass. 821 (Mass. 1971).

358 Mass. 821 (Keliher v. Champion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomson v. Jet Spray Corp.
307 N.E.2d 849 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1974)
Hanlon v. American Employers Insurance
301 N.E.2d 690 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)
Pombo v. Mark Equipment Corp.
296 N.E.2d 509 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)