Durante v. Mezzetti
This text of 127 N.E.2d 309 (Durante v. Mezzetti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Exceptions overruled. The defendants’ demurrers to the plaintiffs’ declaration in tort for deceit were sustained and the plaintiffs “granted 21 days in which to file a motion to amend.” Such motion was filed with a copy of a proposed amended declaration and after hearing was denied. The plaintiffs excepted to the denial. The motion having been addressed to the discretion of the trial judge, its denial in the absence of findings, rulings, or requests for rulings presents no question of law. Means v. Leveroni, 297 Mass. 61, 64. Goodyear Park Co. v. Holyoke, 298 Mass. 510. Urban v. Central Massachusetts Electric Co. 301 Mass. 519, 524. Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co. 303 Mass. 53, 56. Peterson v. Cadogan, 313 Mass. 133, 134.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
127 N.E.2d 309, 332 Mass. 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durante-v-mezzetti-mass-1955.