Keenan v. Southworth

110 Mass. 474
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Gray, J.

The law is well settled, in England and America, that the postmaster general, the deputy postmasters, and their assistants and clerks, appointed and sworn as required by law, are public officers, each of whom is responsible for his own negligence [475] only, and not for that of any of the others, although selected by him, and subject to his orders. Lane v. Cotton, 1 Ld. Raym. 646; S. C.12 Mod. 472. Whitfield v. Le Despencer, Cowp. 754. Dunlop v. Munroe, 7 Cranch, 242. Schroyer v. Lynch, 8 Watts, 453. Bishop v. Williamson, 2 Fairf. 495. Hutchins v. Brackett, 2 Foster, 252.

The ruling at the trial was therefore right; and the plaintiff, having consented to a verdict for the defendant, reserving only the question of the correctness of that ruling, cannot now raise the question whether there was sufficient evidence of the defendant’s own negligence to be submitted to the jury.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keenan v. Southworth, 110 Mass. 474 (Mass. 1872).

110 Mass. 474 (Keenan v. Southworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ali Pineda v. Hamilton Cty., Ohio
977 F.3d 483 (Sixth Circuit, 2020)
Commonwealth ex rel. Orris v. Roberts
141 A.2d 393 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
City of Wagoner v. Case
1935 OK 153 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)
Nelson v. Babcock
248 N.W. 49 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1933)
Lajoie v. Milliken
242 Mass. 508 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
City of Duluth v. Ross
167 N.W. 485 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1918)
Raisler v. Oliver & Co.
97 Ala. 710 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1892)
Hawkins v. Thomas
29 N.E. 157 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1891)
Robertson v. Sichel
127 U.S. 507 (Supreme Court, 1888)
Ellison v. Lindsley
33 N.J. Eq. 258 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1880)
Foster v. M. A. Metts & Co.
55 Miss. 77 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1877)