Keenan v. Dorflinger

19 How. Pr. 153
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1859·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Clerke, Justice,

held that the lien of the attorney for his compensation attached to the claim itself, and existed from the commencement of the action to judgment, and that the taxable costs were prima facie the measure of such compensation.

Motion denied as applied for ; but an order of discontinuance granted, upon payment of the taxable costs to plaintiff’s attorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keenan v. Dorflinger, 19 How. Pr. 153 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1859).

19 How. Pr. 153 (Keenan v. Dorflinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Accounting of Borst
201 Misc. 529 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1952)
In re the Estate of Curley
161 Misc. 391 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1936)