KEEGAN, TRAVIS v. KEEGAN, BRONWEN L.
This text of KEEGAN, TRAVIS v. KEEGAN, BRONWEN L. (KEEGAN, TRAVIS v. KEEGAN, BRONWEN L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
1223 CA 15-01741 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
TRAVIS KEEGAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V ORDER
BRONWEN L. KEEGAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
PAUL M. DEEP, UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LUCILLE M. RIGNANESE, ROME, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
JOHN G. KOSLOSKY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, UTICA.
Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Joan E. Shkane, A.J.), entered June 3, 2015. The amended order, inter alia, awarded primary physical custody of the parties’ children to plaintiff.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: February 3, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
KEEGAN, TRAVIS v. KEEGAN, BRONWEN L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keegan-travis-v-keegan-bronwen-l-nyappdiv-2017.