Keaton v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Keaton v. State

107 S.E. 599, 27 Ga. App. 164, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 751

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 14, 1921

Docket12338

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 S.E. 599 (Keaton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Keaton v. State, 107 S.E. 599, 27 Ga. App. 164, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 751 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

In the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error it is stated that “the only question in this case demanding consideration is the exception to the charge of the court herein quoted.” Granting, that the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made is erroneous, the record shows that the jury was recalled before they had an opportunity to consider the case, the instructions alleged to be erroneous withdrawn, and in lieu thereof instructions given of which no complaint, is made. The error, if any was made, was cured. Dotson v. State, 136 Ga. 244 (4) (71 S. E. 164); Rawlins v. State, 124 Ga. 33 (13) (52 S. E. 1). Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

In the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error it is stated that “the only question in this case demanding consideration is the exception to the charge of the court herein quoted.” Granting, that the excerpt from the charge of which complaint is made is erroneous, the record shows that the jury was recalled before they had an opportunity to consider the case, the instructions alleged to be erroneous withdrawn, and in lieu thereof instructions given of which no complaint, is made. The error, if any was made, was cured. Dotson v. State, 136 Ga. 244 (4) (71 S. E. 164); Rawlins v. State, 124 Ga. 33 (13) (52 S. E. 1). Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 S.E. 599, 27 Ga. App. 164, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keaton-v-state-gactapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack