Kearns v. 8911 Normandy Beach, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kearns v. 8911 Normandy Beach, Inc.

814 So. 2d 516, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5203, 2002 WL 662745

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2002·No. No. 3D01-1212·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See The Florida Bar v. Joy, 679 So.2d 1165, 1167 (Fla.1996) (citing United Am. Bank of Cent. Fla., Inc. v. Seligman, 599 So.2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)), (“In the absence of an express agreement, written or oral, the law will imply from the circumstances of the escrow that the agent has undertaken a legal obligation (l).to know the provisions and conditions of the principal agreement concerning the escrowed property, and (2) to exercise reasonable skill and ordinary diligence in holding and delivering possession of the escrowed property (i.e., to disburse the escrowed funds) in strict accordance with the principals’ agreement.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See The Florida Bar v. Joy, 679 So.2d 1165, 1167 (Fla.1996) (citing United Am. Bank of Cent. Fla., Inc. v. Seligman, 599 So.2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)), (“In the absence of an express agreement, written or oral, the law will imply from the circumstances of the escrow that the agent has undertaken a legal obligation (l).to know the provisions and conditions of the principal agreement concerning the escrowed property, and (2) to exercise reasonable skill and ordinary diligence in holding and delivering possession of the escrowed property (i.e., to disburse the escrowed funds) in strict accordance with the principals’ agreement.”).

Kearns v. 8911 Normandy Beach, Inc., 814 So. 2d 516, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5203, 2002 WL 662745 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

814 So. 2d 516 (Kearns v. 8911 Normandy Beach, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related