Kearney v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
27 Jones & S. 563, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 563
Opinion
[564] The Court (per Curiam) held as stated in the headnote and affirmed the judgment, citing Neuman v. Metropolitan Elevated Railroad Co., 118 N. Y. 627, and distinguishing Kings Co. Fire Insurance Co. v. Stevens, 101 N. Y. 417.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kearney v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co., 27 Jones & S. 563, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 563 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
27 Jones & S. 563 (Kearney v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kings County Fire Ins. Co. v. . Stevens
5 N.E. 353 (New York Court of Appeals, 1886)
Newman v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
23 N.E. 901 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)