Kearney v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
27 Jones & S. 563, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 563
This text of 27 Jones & S. 563 (Kearney v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kearney v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co., 27 Jones & S. 563, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 563 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
Opinion
[564]*564The Court (per Curiam) held as stated in the headnote and affirmed the judgment, citing Neuman v. Metropolitan Elevated Railroad Co., 118 N. Y. 627, and distinguishing Kings Co. Fire Insurance Co. v. Stevens, 101 N. Y. 417.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kings County Fire Ins. Co. v. . Stevens
5 N.E. 353 (New York Court of Appeals, 1886)
Newman v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.
23 N.E. 901 (New York Court of Appeals, 1890)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
27 Jones & S. 563, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kearney-v-metropolitan-elevated-railway-co-nysuperctnyc-1891.