Kean v. Brandon

17 La. Ann. 37
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1865
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 17 La. Ann. 37 (Kean v. Brandon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kean v. Brandon, 17 La. Ann. 37 (La. 1865).

Opinion

Jones, J.

This case was originally before this court and remanded. See 12 An. p. 20. After this case was sent back to the lower court for further proceedings under the mandate of this court, auditors were appointed to render an account between the contending parties.

They found a balance of five thousand seven hundred and sixty-nine dollars and seven cents in favor of defendants, as on reconventional demand.

From a judgment rendered against the plaintiff in favor of defendants, predicated on the report of the auditors, the plaintiff has taken this appeal.

We have examined the record of the first appeal, and the record of this appeal, and find that the defendants have plead no reconventional demand, but the present record before us discloses the fact that defendants offered evidence before the auditors, and introduced proof to like effect on the trial of the cause, to support a reconventional demand without objections on behalf of plaintiff, and also moved to homologate the report of the auditors. We therefore feel authorized under our well settled jurisprudence to decide this case on the evidence adduced, without objection, in the same way had the same been received under a formal pleading of a reconventional demand. 4 An. 193, Eastran v. Harris; 5 An. 184, Ames v. The People's Telegraph; 9 An. 255, Gayrre v. Tennard.

The report of the auditors having been received in evidence without objection, and the oral evidence of the auditors on the trial of the case fully supporting their report, we feel justified in confirming the original judgment. ■

Therefore, for these reasons, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the lower Court be affirmed, with costs.

HowEnn, J., recused. InsiiEY, J., absent,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phillips v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
190 So. 565 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1939)
Ethridge-Atkins Corporation v. Abraham
160 So. 817 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1935)
Dupuis v. Reynaud
8 La. App. 116 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1928)
Board of Com'rs v. Dowdle & Windett
67 So. 324 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1915)
Ellis v. Singletary
45 Tex. 27 (Texas Supreme Court, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 La. Ann. 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kean-v-brandon-la-1865.