Kealiinohomoku v. Monsanto Company

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedAugust 2, 2021
Docket2:21-cv-00701
StatusUnknown

This text of Kealiinohomoku v. Monsanto Company (Kealiinohomoku v. Monsanto Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kealiinohomoku v. Monsanto Company, (D. Nev. 2021).

Opinion

Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 13398 Filed 08/02/21 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —280)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 3,359 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the LL stay is lifted. — Aug 02, 2021 ( COUNTED SES John W. Nichols MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel | hereby certify that the annexed instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. ATTEST: SUSAN Y. SOONG Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California

Deputy Clerk Date: 8/2/2021

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2741 SCHEDULE CTO−280 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 21−05524 Anousheh Sabouri et al v. Monsanto Corporation et al ILLINOIS NORTHERN ILN 1 21−03818 Lookingland v. Monsanto Company LOUISIANA WESTERN LAW 1 21−02086 Ferrington et al v. Monsanto Company MINNESOTA MN 0 21−01652 Seigler v. Monsanto Company MISSOURI EASTERN MOE 4 21−00444 Estate of Mary Caterino et al v. Monsanto Company NEVADA NV 2 21−00701 Kealiinohomoku v. Monsanto Company OHIO NORTHERN OHN 3 21−01355 Foreman v. Monsanto Company PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN PAW 2 21−00675 WARHOLAK v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al TENNESSEE EASTERN TNE 3 21−00235 Williams v. Monsanto Company UTAH UT 2 21−00292 Leibel v. Monsanto

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Roundup Products Liability Litigation
214 F. Supp. 3d 1346 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kealiinohomoku v. Monsanto Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kealiinohomoku-v-monsanto-company-nvd-2021.