Ke Dian Wang v. Ladeon Francis, et al.
This text of Ke Dian Wang v. Ladeon Francis, et al. (Ke Dian Wang v. Ladeon Francis, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KE DIAN WANG, Petitioner, 25-CV-9830 (JPO) -V- ORDER LADEON FRANCIS, et al., Respondents.
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: On consent of the parties, the Court finds that jurisdiction and venue in this habeas corpus action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 properly lie in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, where Petitioner was confined at the time the petition was filed. See Ozturk v. Hyde, 136 F.4th 382, 391 (2d Cir. 2025); Khalil v. Joyce, 771 F. Supp. 3d 268, 286-92 (S.D.N.Y. 2025). The Order at ECF No. 4 enjoining Petitioner’s removal from the United States and from specified districts shall remain in effect unless and until the transferee court orders otherwise. See id. at 291. Accordingly, this case is hereby TRANSFERRED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer the case immediately, and the seven-day waiting period in Local Rule 83.1 is waived. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2025 New York, New York
J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ke Dian Wang v. Ladeon Francis, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ke-dian-wang-v-ladeon-francis-et-al-njd-2025.