KCL Associates v. Islamorada Realty, Inc.

563 So. 2d 112, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3150, 1990 WL 58276
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1990·No. No. 89-1797·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dismissal of a complaint for interpleader was correct where the interpleader-plain-tiff’s potential liability to two parties claiming broker’s commissions, was based on independent contracts between the inter-pleader and those claiming under the separate agreements. See Sea Management Serv., Ltd. v. Club Sea, Inc., 512 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (interpleader is appropriate only where claims are dependent or have common origin, the same thing, debt, duty or stake is claimed by defendants, and plaintiff has no interest in the subject matter and is in a position of indifference, having incurred no independent liability to either of the claimants); Riverside Bank v. Florida Dealers and Growers Bank, 151 So.2d 834 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963) (same).

No abuse of discretion is shown in the trial court’s award of a $17,100 fee based on 136.8 hours of the attorneys’ time at $125 per hour. The award finds sufficient evidentiary support in the record. See City of Sunrise v. West Broward Utils., Inc., 311 So.2d 175 (Fla. 4th DCA) (appellate function is to examine the record and determine if there is substantial competent evidence to support the amounts allowed for attorney’s fees), cert. denied, 325 So.2d 10 (Fla.1975).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KCL Associates v. Islamorada Realty, Inc., 563 So. 2d 112, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3150, 1990 WL 58276 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 112 (KCL Associates v. Islamorada Realty, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sea Management Service v. Club Sea
512 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Riverside Bank v. Florida Dealers & Growers Bank
151 So. 2d 834 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
City of Sunrise v. West Broward Utilities, Inc.
311 So. 2d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)