City of Sunrise v. West Broward Utilities, Inc.

311 So. 2d 175
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 14, 1975
Docket74-699
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 311 So. 2d 175 (City of Sunrise v. West Broward Utilities, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Sunrise v. West Broward Utilities, Inc., 311 So. 2d 175 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

311 So.2d 175 (1975)

CITY OF SUNRISE, Florida, a Municipal Corporation Existing under and by Virtue of the Laws of the State of Florida, Appellant,
v.
WEST BROWARD UTILITIES, INC., a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 74-699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 14, 1975.
Rehearing Denied May 6, 1975.

Anthony J. Titone of Parkhurst, LaHurd & Purdy, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Maurice M. Garcia of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick & Schneider, Hollywood, for appellees-West Broward Utilities, Inc., J. Jay Barnett and Helen T. Barnett.

Ellen S. Mills Gibbs of Kirsch & Mills, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-City of Plantation.

DOWNEY, Judge.

Appellant instituted an eminent domain action to condemn waste water treatment facilities owned by appellee West Broward Utilities, Inc. Several months later after issue was joined appellant filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. Thereupon, appellees moved the court to tax costs and assess attorney's fees. Appellant seeks review of the trial court's order allowing attorney's fees and costs.

Our appellate function is to examine the record and determine if there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the trial court's exercise of discretion in the amounts allowed for attorney's fees and costs. 8 Fla.Jur., Costs, § 41. Such an examination of this record reflects adequate evidentary support for all of the fees and costs allowed.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

MAGER, J., concurs.

CROSS, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KCL Associates v. Islamorada Realty, Inc.
563 So. 2d 112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Neimark v. Abramson
403 So. 2d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Adams v. Fisher
390 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Estate of Hampton v. Fairchild-Fla. Const. Co.
341 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 So. 2d 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-sunrise-v-west-broward-utilities-inc-fladistctapp-1975.