Kaza v. Gardner

65 A.D.2d 958, 410 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13888
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1978·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant’s inspection of the medical and hospital records of the Cleveland Clinic should have been permitted pursuant to CPLR 3121 (see Mendelson v Shein, 58 AD2d 859; Greuling v Breakey, 56 AD2d 540, 542). Plaintiffs may not successfully contend that because they do not intend to have a representative of the Cleveland Clinic testify at the time of the trial, 22 NYCRR 1024.25 forecloses disclosure of these records to defendant (Brooks v Hausauer, 51 AD2d 660). The time for plaintiff Pamela Kaza to furnish the authorization is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court — medical— hospital records.) Present — Marsh, P. J., Moule, Simons, Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kaza v. Gardner, 65 A.D.2d 958, 410 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13888 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

65 A.D.2d 958 (Kaza v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calhoun v. Pickett
77 A.D.2d 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Ricciuti v. Town of Schaghticoke
104 Misc. 2d 577 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)