Kaye v. M & J Associates
This text of 46 A.D.2d 894 (Kaye v. M & J Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries* defendant M & J Associates appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 11, 1974, which (1) denied its motion to compel plaintiff to furnish it with a copy of written statements obtained by or on behalf of plaintiff from one or more of said defendant’s employees and (2) granted plaintiff’s cross motion for a protective order with respect thereto. Order reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements, appellant’s motion granted and plaintiff’s cross motion denied. It is well settled that any written statements made by a party’s employees to an opposing party may be obtained by discovery procedure, where such party-employer is a corporation (CPLR 31Ó1, subd. [e]; Magee v. Faymour Development Go., 32 A D 2d 811; Briggs V. Spencerport. Road Plaza, 19 A D 2d 943; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3101.56), as well as where it is an assocation (cf. Smith v. Robilotto, 27 A D 2d 684). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Cohalan and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A.D.2d 894, 361 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kaye-v-m-j-associates-nyappdiv-1974.