Joseph v. Angstrom, Inc.

198 A.D.2d 863, 604 N.Y.S.2d 431
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred insofar as it denied the motion of third-party defendant Elkem Metals, Inc. (Elkem) to compel plaintiff to produce statements in her possession of Elkem’s employees. A party may obtain a copy of his own statement and, if that party is a corporation, it is entitled to obtain any statements made by its employees to an opposing party (CPLR 3101 [e]; Kaye v M & J Assocs., 46 AD2d 894; Briggs v Spencerport Rd. Plaza, 19 AD2d 943). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Koshian, J. — Discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Balio, Doerr and Boomer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph v. Angstrom, Inc., 198 A.D.2d 863, 604 N.Y.S.2d 431 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 863 (Joseph v. Angstrom, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Le v. Putnam
240 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)